the Fed造句怎么写

He didn't think the Fed could deliver full employment.

The Fed already has such a Bureau; it is ineffectual because the Fed CARES about the solvency of Banks, not the solvency of their customers.

The TARP will absorb the first $20 billion of losses; the Fed will lend the rest.

The more the Fed cuts, the bigger the risk of inflation in emerging markets.

Approaching the New Changes of the Fed Discount Policy From the Avoidance of Financial Risks;

Wall Street, the Fed, and Newport Beach took the other side.

Through instruments such as open-market operations, the Fed directly controls the quantity of money supplied.

As shown above, the interest rate the Fed would like to have is negative.

This is a very interesting time because the Fed is continuing to invent.

真正的弃俗并不是反对这个世界，并不反对肉体，这和肉体一点关系也没有，它纯粹是意识的觉醒。你变成无选择的，不再执迷于任何事物，在那个无所执迷，无所选择的意识状态下，聪明睿智于焉升起。

The inflationary virus of the 1970s had been felled by the Fed by the spring of 1982.

The gap between the Fed and the rest is having its plainest effects in the currency markets.

The Fed failed to identify the twin bubbles of the last decade — in the stock market and in real estate — and we have to hope that the Fed and its global counterparts will do better in the future.

Through curtailing supply and boosting demand, the Fed wants to stabilize the property price and the economy.

Untethered from the goldstandard and the Bretton Woods system, and insufficiently accountable toCongress, the Fed creates money by fiat.

That's a trivial change, basically the least the Fed could get away with without facing a firestorm of criticism - and far short of the major asset-purchase program the Fed should be undertaking.

A tumbling currency would prevent the Fed from cutting interest rates, deepening and spreading the economic pain.

Indeed, even though bond yields have risen, the Fed probably regards the latest round of QE as a success.

This is January of this year, before the Fed cut interest rates, and this is the term structure.

The Fed also plans to use reverse repurchase agreements to reduce excess liquidity. In a reverse repo, the Fed lends securities for a set period, draining cash from the banking system.

It could then expand its balance-sheet indefinitely without driving the fed funds rate to zero; a bank will not lend out excess reserves at 0.25% if it can earn 1.75% at the Fed.

To see what I'm talking about, let's ask what policies the Fed actually should be pursuing right now.

By buying Treasury securities, the Fed aims to lower long-term interest rates and increase expectations of future inflation.

Alan Greenspan, a former Fed chairman, says inflation will exceed 10% if the Fed fails to shrink its balance-sheet and raise rates, and 3% for a time even if it does.

Right now, the Fed is delaying the day of reckoning and, in the process, exporting the US's problems by adopting policies that, intentionally or not, weaken the dollar.

The President will propose the creation of a council of regulators, but the Fed will not need to seek the council's approval to act against systemic risks.

Others worry not that the Fed will prolong the slump but that it may sow the seeds of the next crisis.

The second puzzle happened last week when the Fed reported on the methods used by bank examiners for the stress tests.

But by the time the Fed lowered rates again at the end of that month, its move was seen by investors as a sign of desperation.

They could also borrow from the Fed.

Nor should the Fed be now.

Inside the Fed, the pressure is also for tighter policy.

When velocity swings widely, the Fed shouldn't be passive.

Soft loans from the Fed were designed to tempt investors into buying securities; the Treasury promised to take the first tranche of any losses, thus protecting the Fed.

That has the Obama administration and the Fed on the defensive.

In the 1970s and 1980s Congressmen regularly threatened to impeach the Fed chairman.

However, “firms ability to pass along cost increases by raising selling prices varied,” the Fed said.

How Do Central Banks Deal with Systematic Financial Risk:Experiences and References from the Fed

The unsaid is that the Fed does not talk about the dollar, leaving that to the US Treasury.

The problem is that if the Fed has the power to counterfeit, it will inevitably use that power.

Once prices return to a favorable level, the Fed begins to reduce rates again and the boom bust cycle repeats.

In the past, I myself have argued that the Fed chairman has a responsibility to say when he thinks more of a stimulative boost is required than the Fed alone can handle.

I do expect the Fed to do its job, and right now it looks like the Fed is saying it has no responsibility for meeting its nominal goals. That's not acceptable.

If the Fed is to receive this expanded macroprudential role, it should be stripped of its microprudential duties.

Under the law, the Fed has the authority to lend to any nonbank, but only if the loan is "secured to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve bank."

Unless financial markets or growth prospects take a further turn for the worse, the Fed and the Bank will need to do the same before long.

Again, the Fed responded by rushing money to banks, this time via a new arrangement called the Term Auction Facility. Again the markets calmed down, for a while.

Some think the Fed may act sooner.

And the cynics believe the Fed is at it again.

He himself advocated the policies the Fed followed, and in fact, was critical of the Fed raising rates even when it belatedly did so in 2004.

If, for instance, the banking system were indeed in danger, then the Fed should step in.

He believes the recent actions of the Fed, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England endorse his view.

The Federal Reserve is independent, but Congress and the White House have ways to pressure the Fed.

This secrecy by the Fed in its appropriations of taxpayer money and the most-likely worthless collateral it exchanged it for represents inflationary risks the Fed is attempting to conceal.

If the Fed went further and started to buy illiquid assets outright, as some are advocating, that would be different.

At the same time, the (expected) lack of additional easing by the Fed and the need to begin to reduce its balance sheet will also decrease investor demand.

Fed sycophants argue that an audit would destroy the financial markets' faith in the Fed.

The cost to the system-a measly $600 billion injection of Funds by the Fed.

Yet a revaluation would not address the problem of policy inflexibility; the GCC would still be yoked to the Fed.

I believe that when we finally finish it all, the Fed would end up with more power, not less.

In fact, the inspector general who has the responsibility for overseeing the Fed told congress that she does not have this information.

Private forecasters believe the Fed should sit tight, according to a new Wall Street Journal survey.

"Then do we take the pain, or do we go with the nuclear option of increasing the balance sheets of the ECB and the Fed," Laggner asks.

Because the Fed can pretty much dictate to the Banks right now, what additional powers would nationalization bring?

For now, it seems the Fed is sitting idle.